|
Reverse Speech - The First 20 Years
By David John
Oates
Copyright (C) 2004
It is the 20th
anniversary of Reverse Speech coming up in October 2003. This
article is written to look at the highlights of those 20 years
and how Reverse Speech has grown since then.
In my previous articles I
described
Reverse Speech as another form of human communication, a covert
form that occurs backwards in our speech. Reverse Speech theory
states that language is bi-level, forward and backwards. As the
human brain is constructing the sounds of speech, it is
constructing those sounds in such a way that two messages are
communicated simultaneously. One forwards from the conscious
mind, and the other backwards from the unconscious mind. We are
consciously unaware of this secondary form of communication,
which I have entitled Reverse Speech, but the unconscious mind
is aware of it. It hears its messages every time we speak and
recognises the messages as human intuition.
In practice
Reverse Speech can be heard and analysed by recording human
speech and literally playing it backwards. Clear, grammatically
correct sentences can then be heard amongst the normal backwards
gibberish at regular intervals. Its rate of occurrence can vary
depending on the nature of the speech. In rapid conversation
between 2 or more people in high rapport, these backward
messages can occur as often as once every 5 seconds. In
structured monologues, the backward messages reduce in frequency
to once every 30-60 seconds and in scripted public speeches, it
can occur as little as once every 5 minutes.
Backwards
messages also occur in young children as early as 4 months of
age. At this age, they usually occur once every few minutes or
so and will often be only 1 or 2 words, such as help, daddy,
mummy etc. As the child grows older, these backward messages
increase in their complexity until by the time the child is
13-14 months of age their backward messages will be prolific,
occurring frequently and consisting of long complex sentences.
They have even been found in non verbal children including a
handicapped 13 year old girl who only spoke in groans forwards.
A very clear backward message was found on this child that said,
Mummy, Love you.
Reverse
Speech can reveal a variety of different information. On the
surface level, if a lie is spoken forwards, the reversal can
correct that lie and communicate the truth. If pertinent facts
are left out of the conversation, the reversal may insert those
facts. This can prove to be extremely beneficial in many areas.
For example,
in law enforcement, Reverse Speech can be used to determine the
truthfulness of a suspect’s statements. It can also reveal the
location of key pieces of evidence the authorities may need to
pursue a conviction. Since I first began my research into this
phenomenon in 1983, I have seen Reverse Speech used successfully
by authorities in several incidents. In 1988 Reverse Speech was
used informally by the Sydney police in a high profile murder
case. The speech reversals revealed the type of gun used and the
person who pulled the trigger. A year later in Brisbane 1989, it
was used by a reporter during the Royal Commission into
corruption in Queensland. Speech reversals revealed the name and
branch of a bank where former police commissioner, Terry Lewis,
had hidden funds.
In late
1989, I moved to the United States where I lived for 10 years
researching and promoting this new field. In the early 1990s I
worked occasionally for the Dallas police where, in one case,
speech reversals successfully confirmed the suspect in a murder
case had indeed committed the crime and they described in detail
his motives for this crime. In 1993, I consulted with FBI during
the David Koresh Waco siege. I prepared a report, based on
Koresh’s speech reversals, that stated Koresh would come out of
the compound if the authorities backed off their presence or
they let his grandmother in to negotiate. Unfortunately the
authorities did not follow the recommendations of my report and
the tragedy that followed was horrific.
Since that
time the use of Reverse Speech in the law enforcement field has
been taken up by one of my trained students and senior
practitioners, Jack Johnston, in the state of Oregon. Jack
consults regularly with attorneys in that state and has had some
amazing success. In one case in the late 1990s, he found
information in the speech reversals of a woman who had accused 4
youths of raping her, that pointed to another person being
responsible. This information was subsequently verified by DNA
analysis and the four youths were found to be innocent. So
impressed have the authorities been with Jack’s work that
Reverse Speech training has now been accepted as an optional
extra in the State of Oregon police department’s training
program.
Given the
amazing potential that Reverse Speech has as a truth detector I
believe that in time we will see it being used by many police
departments as an adjunct to the lie detector and other truth
seeking technologies.
Reverse
Speech first came to the public limelight in 1987 when I
released my first book on the subject entitled “Beyond
Backward Masking”, co-authored with my then research partner
Greg Albrecht. Several media outlets reported on the story with
one of them, SAS channel 7, describing it as the discovery of
the seventh sense. From that time, I soon learned that the media
and general public craved to know the reversals of prominent
politicians and public figures.
One of my
first case studies was with then Australian Prime Minister, Bob
Hawke. After he won the 1987 general election I found a speech
reversal on him, when he was asked by a reporter how did he plan
to celebrate his win, that said “Used to smoke the best
marijuana.” The media promptly reported this reversal in
several outlets along with the ever popular first words to be
spoken on the lunar surface by Neil Armstrong. Where he says
forwards, “That’s one small step for man”, a speech
reversal can be heard that says “Man will space walk.”
When I moved
to the United States I continued my analysis of public figures
by turning my attention to the current Bush Snr. administration.
I had not anticipated the controversy I would cause just prior
to the first Gulf war when I found the seemingly innocuous word,
“Simone”, backwards on several senior figures in the
administration, including President Bush and then Defence
Secretary, Dick Cheney. One instance of this reversal occurred
on President Bush in the complete phrase, “Simone, Simone in
the sands.” In addition to this I also found the occasional
reference to troop movements and war plans such as one reversal
that said “Sent the seahawk up.” The Seahawk, I later
discovered, was an attack helicopter used on aircraft carriers.
At around
the same time I found these reversals, I had been contacted by
Scott Jones, a well known figure in Washington DC who was
employed at that time by Senator Clairborne Pell to seek out new
technologies and bring them into mainstream. I told Jones about
my discoveries and he immediately sent a confidential memo to
Defence Secretary, Dick Cheney, telling him about Reverse Speech
and in particular the word, Simone. Somehow this memo was
leaked to the press and almost overnight Reverse Speech hit many
major media outlets in both the United States and Europe,
becoming the lead story on CNN news, using headlines like, “Is
the President hiding secret code words backwards in his speech?”
Scott Jones
immediately contacted me after this occurred and implored me not
to speak to the press about my work or Simone. He also
rescheduled a lecture tour I had planned to Washington DC to a
few months later to give the controversy time to calm down.
These lectures subsequently took place and over a period of 5
days I presented Reverse Speech to officials from the FBI, the
Secret Service and other agencies in Washington. The Simone
incident had a rather dramatic ending when I discovered that it
was a derivation of an Arabic word that meant “A dust storm
in the desert” or “A desert storm.” Imagine my
surprise when I was watching CNN a few weeks later and they
announced the beginning of Operation Desert Storm. Had I
unwittingly found the actual code word they were using for this
operation long before it was announced publicly?
This is not
the only time Reverse Speech has revealed public events before
they were announced in the media. In 1997 I found reversals on
President Bill Clinton that talked about another Iraq invasion.
One time when he was talking forwards about Iraq, he said in
reverse, “Lets shoot for the assassin.” In another
instance he had a reversal that said “Our wrath won’t shake
the fox.” Shortly after I found these reversals, the United
States conducted another operation in Iraq entitled Operation
Desert Fox that failed at that time to oust the Iraqi dictator.
The speech reversals had proven to be stunningly accurate!
Bill
Clinton’s sexual indiscretions are now well known but I was
finding references to them in his speech reversals long before
they ever became public knowledge. In fact in the late 1990s
when I was doing the circuit of TV and radio talk shows in the
United States, I was making open predictions on the air about
his sexuality with reversals like “Had sex with an Oregon
Madam,” (Monica Lewinski went to college in Oregon) and “She’s
a fun girl to kiss” and “You trash, make her swallow.”
I even went so far as to predict a dire outcome for his
presidency based on a reversal I found in his second
inauguration speech that said “The world will come and damn
you.” This was later reinforced by a reversal I found on
political pundit George Stephanopolous when he was discussing
the possibility forwards of Bill Clinton’s impeachment. The
reversal said “Grave fate.” As
we all know,
Bill Clinton was indeed impeached.
My outspoken
stand on Bill Clinton and other public figures won me few
friends in the United States and several radio commentators
accused me of bias with my findings. One show even accused me of
manipulating audio files to make the reversals say something
different than they actually did, according to a political
agenda that I was running. It was then that I was introduced to
the darker side of the United States. In April 1997, the Reverse
Speech offices were set ablaze and totally destroyed by persons
unknown. This was followed by numerous break-ins in our new
premises and hundreds of death threats. Finally in mid 1999 I
was sued for defamation and slander. The case was settled out
of court but it was the final straw for me and I moved back to
Australia with my family in November 1999.
Now
we have a new President in the United States, President George
W. Bush, and a study of his reversals can tell us lot about his
character. I think the most telling occurs right after the
attack on the world trade centre when he says forwards, “An
act of war was committed on the
United
States of America.”
Backwards he says “Rule the planet, Dad.” Two weeks
prior to the United States going into Iraq, I found the
following reversal on George Bush as he talked about the need
for a new government in Iraq. Forwards he says, “the form and
leadership of that government is for the
Iraq people
to chose.”
Backwards he says “We will sit in
Baghdad.”
This reversal plus others that said, “The shows over” and
“I will beat this silly business” led me to announce at a
lecture I gave in Melbourne that the US would invade Iraq within
2 weeks, and they indeed did so. Speech reversals have also
revealed his attitude towards then United States Senate with
reversals such as, Senate, they’re all first year losers,
and Choke the fuckers now, referring to the US Congress.
Recent
speech reversals that I found on US Secretary of State, Colin
Powel, in early 2004, suggest that the US Government may not
have been exactly honest with us concerning alleged weapons of
mass destruction. On one occasion when Powel talks forwards
about weapons Saddam Hussein might have had he says in reverse,
But it’s a scam. He clarifies this further a little
later, still talking about WMD, when he says in reverse,
United
States scam.
This seems to be supported by a reversal found on US Defence
Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, prior to the war, when he was
talking about the information they had received from
intelligence gathering confirming WMD. He says in reverse, we
deal this evil on the facts, indicating that all is not on
the up and up with the information he is delivering. On another
occasion when Colin Powel was talking forwards about the future
of an Iraqi government, he said in reverse, Will Iraq burn,
indicating some doubt over the future, and before the war he had
a very telling reversal, when talking about future action in
Iraq, that said, Forgive me.
As this
article has shown so far, the potential that Reverse Speech has
as a truth detector is phenomenal. Its uses include law
enforcement and a personality profile for our politicians. In
fact any situation where human speech is recorded and extra
information is required, is ideal for Reverse Speech. I have
several clients who use Reverse Speech before making important
business decisions. Speech reversals can tell you whether the
business will succeed or fail, whether you can trust your
business partner, and whether a potential employee will be
beneficial for the business.
In one case
a man I was going to do business with had a reversal that said “I’m
so full of shit.” Clearly not a man to do business with! One
of my clients in Tasmania was warned by his reversals of
industrial espionage in business, and a client in Sydney
recently saved herself several thousand dollars when speech
reversals warned her against a particular investment. Other
people she knew ignored the advice of Reverse Speech and lost
all their money a few months later when the venture failed.
The other
area that Reverse Speech excels in is the therapeutic and
healing modalities. This is my own personal love of the
technology and I currently have a thriving practice where I work
with clients from all over the world via phone. I work with a
variety of issues ranging from physical ailments to emotional
and psychological issues, even marital counselling and
relationship advice. Reversals will often reveal the precise
reason and causes of current issues and often suggest solutions.
I covered this aspect of my work in my first article in this
magazine last year.
I have also
developed a comprehensive training program over the last 20
years and I am anxious to train others in the skills of this
technology as soon as possible. If you are looking for a new and
exciting career in a brand new field then contact our offices
for further details. Alternatively you can experience Reverse
Speech yourself with an initial introductory 5 minute taping for
$49. In Australia, direct all enquiries to 1800 720029 -
International 61 8 8382-4372 or visit our website at
http://www.reversespeech.com
where all reversals quoted in this article can be heard plus
1000s more.
| ^top
of page |
David
John Oates
Founder and Developer of Reverse Speech
Technologies
PO Box 678, Noarlunga Centre, SA 5168.
Australia
phone: 08 83824372 - international: 61 8
83824372
|
Reverse
Speech TM is a trademark owned
by David John Oates.
All contents of the web site is Copyright
© 2001 by David John Oates |
|